Welcome!
Register
Election, Reprobation and Romans 6:23: Rant
I see no conflict. My point was that Richard dropped the "believes," substituting "well really only those who God...
by Randy Brandt  2008-10-30  7:42pm
Pagitt's Purgatory: Rant
If you call that blunt honesty. I mean, he said it, but do you think he could have been much less coherent?...
by Matt  2008-10-29  5:59pm
The Courage to Be Protestant: Non-Fiction
Here is another review by someone who shares your insistence on inerrancy and penal substitution. Can you say...
by Henry  2008-06-11  6:05pm
The Shack: Fiction
C) It's no doubt plausible to find bits of universalism throughout the book as, like you mentioned, the author is a...
by   2008-10-11  4:38pm
Unless otherwise noted, all contents Copyright 2001-2008 Randy Brandt

Beliefs: 3

I believe in the the correspondence theory of truth. That simply means that truth is that which really is. If something conforms to reality, it is true. If not, it is false...

Rational discourse is impossible without the Law of Non-Contradiction (somewhat ironically, it's sometimes called the Law of Contradiction). This concept asserts that A cannot equal non-A, where A represents any proposition (propositions are statements that are either true or false)...

I am not a deconstructionist. I believe that words have meanings that can be conveyed from the writer to the reader. While the message is subject to a degree of distortion by our individual experiences, cultures and beliefs, the essential intent may be communicated successfully...